We found 3 issuescosting you truston cookeddev.lol.
The Africa jobs page says roles are open to Africa but lists UK roles.
Watch the inspection.
We navigate your site the way customers would. Idle time is skipped.
How the composite score works
The overall score is a weighted average of the categories: Getting the product 40%, Trust before buying 20%, Mobile 15%, Speed 15%, and Polish and audit 10%. It is never more than 10 points above the Getting the product score, because a product a visitor cannot get cannot score well on anything else, and never more than 25 points above the weakest category, so one badly broken area is not averaged away. Any issue in the main list caps it at 89, so a score above 90 means nothing worth fixing was found.
Each category starts at 100 and stays there when nothing was found in it, whether or not the inspection got that far. Each distinct verified finding deducts 60 points for a serious problem on the path from arriving to paying, 40 for another serious problem, 30, 15 or 8 by high, medium or low severity otherwise, and 4 for an audit finding. Each additional finding below the list takes 2 more points off the overall score, up to 10. Scores stop at zero and round to whole numbers. The formula is fixed and versioned, so the same saved evidence always receives the same score.
The Africa jobs page says roles are open to Africa but lists UK roles
Job seekers in Africa are told 485 roles are open to them, and they can pay for Pro before finding out most are limited to European countries.
/remote-jobs/africa is titled "Remote Jobs Open to Africa", and its FAQ answers "Can I apply from my country?" with "These roles list Africa or worldwide as eligible locations." Of the 30 latest roles listed, only one says "Remote, Global" and none mentions Africa. Most are tied to Europe, such as "Remote - UK", "Remote - Germany" and "London". The page's "See companies and apply" button sends visitors toward signup and Pro, so they meet this claim right before deciding to pay.
Try it: Open /remote-jobs/africa, read the locations under "Latest roles", then expand the FAQ "Can I apply from my country?" and compare the two.
The pricing FAQ gets the Pro break-even point wrong
Buyers choosing between a $2.99 unlock and $9.99/month Pro get price advice that sends a three-job applicant to the more expensive plan.
On /pricing, the answer to "What's the difference between an unlock and Pro?" says "If you're applying to more than two jobs a month, Pro is cheaper." Three unlocks cost 3 × $2.99 = $8.97, which is less than Pro at $9.99/month, so Pro only costs less from four jobs a month. Buyers meet this line at the pricing step, right as they pick a plan, and anyone who does the sum can see the advice does not match the prices on the cards above it.
Try it: Open /pricing, scroll to "Pricing questions" and expand "What's the difference between an unlock and Pro?". Compare its "more than two jobs" line with 3 × $2.99 = $8.97 against $9.99/month.
The home page says 4 PDF templates, but everywhere else says eight
Job seekers reading the home page get two different template counts a few lines apart, right before they decide whether to sign up.
On the home page, the "WHAT YOU GET" card reads "4 PDF templates: from Classic to Bold, with your choice of accent colour and font." A little further down, the templates heading reads "Eight layouts, all built to survive an ATS." The /templates page shows eight named layouts and says "All eight Cooked templates follow these rules." A visitor meets this mismatch while working out what they get, before they sign up or pay.
Try it: Open https://www.cookeddev.lol/ and scroll to "WHAT YOU GET". Compare the "4 PDF templates" card with the "Eight layouts" heading below it.
The home page has no Content-Security-Policy or CORP header
The response from https://www.cookeddev.lol/ is missing Content-Security-Policy and Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy.
The founder avatar initials have very low contrast
The "NJ" initials in the founder avatar on / and /pricing use #b3ada0 text on a #ff7043 background, a contrast ratio of 1.22 against the required 4.5:1. The avatar is decorative, so this fails the accessibility rule but does not block any step a buyer takes.
Probie fixes this for you.
Stop customers hitting the same friction. Connect your codebase and Probie reproduces these failures, tests the fix, and opens a pull request for your review.
Sign up and get this fixedFree inspection
What should Probie inspect next?
Enter a project URL. There is nothing to install.
Probie checks every issue twice, respects robots.txt, and backs off at bot challenges.
Enter an address and we will email the report card link.