We found 1 issuecosting you truston www.lindy.ai.
Watch the inspection.
We navigate your site the way customers would. Idle time is skipped.
How the composite score works
The overall score is a weighted average of the categories: Getting the product 40%, Trust before buying 20%, Mobile 15%, Speed 15%, and Polish and audit 10%. It is never more than 10 points above the Getting the product score, because a product a visitor cannot get cannot score well on anything else, and never more than 25 points above the weakest category, so one badly broken area is not averaged away. Any issue in the main list caps it at 89, so a score above 90 means nothing worth fixing was found.
Each category starts at 100 and stays there when nothing was found in it, whether or not the inspection got that far. Each distinct verified finding deducts 60 points for a serious problem on the path from arriving to paying, 40 for another serious problem, 30, 15 or 8 by high, medium or low severity otherwise, and 4 for an audit finding. Each additional finding below the list takes 2 more points off the overall score, up to 10. Scores stop at zero and round to whole numbers. The formula is fixed and versioned, so the same saved evidence always receives the same score.
The Plus plan price differs between two pages
Conflicting purchase terms undermine trust before customers pay.
The Plus plan is priced differently on two pages of the project. The homepage pricing section lists "Plus Enough for everyday usage. $29.99 /mo per user" with 3k credits per user per month, while the Lindy vs Superhuman comparison page lists "Plus Your AI executive assistant. $49.99 / month" above its feature list. Both figures describe the same named plan tier, so a visitor comparing the two pages sees conflicting costs before signing up.
Try it: Open / and read the Plus card in the pricing section, then open /lindy-vs-superhuman and read the Plus column heading. Compare the two prices.
A resource on the home page returns 404
Loading the home page of www.lindy.ai produces a console error: "Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()". The request for that referenced resource is answered with a 404 by the server on every load. The rendered page above the fold still paints, so the failing asset is not visibly missing in the layout, but the reference points at a path that no longer resolves.
The home page requests an unreplaced logo placeholder URL
The home page at / issues three image requests to https://www.lindy.ai/LINDY_LOGO_URL, and each returns HTTP 404. The path is an unsubstituted template token rather than a real asset path, so the image source was never filled in with the logo URL. Three broken image requests are made on every load of the route.
Three security response headers are missing
The response from https://www.lindy.ai/ is missing X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff, Referrer-Policy, and Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy.
Low contrast text fails WCAG AA on the home page
The G2 rating "4.9" (span.text-size-small.u-color-faded) renders at 4.39:1 with #6e767f on #fcf9f8 at 14px, the product demo sidebar heading "Channels" (div.side-sect) at 2.96:1 with #8894a0 on #fafafb, and the agent status line "3 steps done in 21s" inside #thread at 3.09:1 with #8894a0 on #ffffff at 12.5px. All three are real content rather than decorative fill, and they are the faintest labels on the page for readers with low vision.
Probie fixes this for you.
Stop customers hitting the same friction. Connect your codebase and Probie reproduces these failures, tests the fix, and opens a pull request for your review.
Sign up and get this fixedFree inspection
What should Probie inspect next?
Enter a project URL. There is nothing to install.
Probie checks every issue twice, respects robots.txt, and backs off at bot challenges.
Enter an address and we will email the report card link.